User agent detail

Dr.Web anti-virus License:Google Shareware LicenseState:LICENSE KEY Version: 9.00.1.7031 Device model: HTC One Firmware version: 4.1.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne Firmware version: 4.1.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dr closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCOne Firmware version: 4.1.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCOne Firmwaresmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCOne Firmware version: 4.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTC One Firmwarecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCOne Firmware version: 4.1.2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:07 | by ThaDafinser