User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5620L/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/1.5 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5620L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5620L 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 1.5close SamsungGT-S5620Lmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 1.5WebKit SamsungGT-S5620Lsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungGT-S5620Lcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56506 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.5 Touchwiz 2.0SamsungMontemobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Openwave Browser 6.3close SamsungGT-S5620LFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:07 | by ThaDafinser