User agent detail

Mozilla/4.08 (P905i;FOMA;c500;TB;W85H30)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DoCoMoP905i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close PanasonicP905imobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoP905icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
PanasonicP905imobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo P905icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close PanasonicP904iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:07 | by ThaDafinser