User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (ChoX11; U; RISC OS; xx; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20090803 BonEcho/2.0.0.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.20RISC OS Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0.0.20closeRISK OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox BonEcho (2.0Gecko RISC OS yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BonEcho 2.0.0.20closeRISC OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.20Gecko 20090803a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.20Gecko 1.8.1RISC OS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:07 | by ThaDafinser