User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; One S Build/KTU84Q) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.117 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-427.php
Chrome 37.0Android 4.4unknown HTCOne SMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4HTCOne SMobile Phoneyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.4HTCPJ401mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 37.0Blink Android 4.4HTCOne Ssmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 37.0.2062closeAndroid 4.4.4HTCOne Scloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Android 4.4.4HTCOne Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 37closeAndroid 4.4HTCPJ401Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:05 | by ThaDafinser