User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; Pt-br; NOKIAN95 8GB)/UC Browser8.2.0.132/28/351/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN95 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.06 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Symbian OS Series 60 V3NokiaN95smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser UCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeSymbian OS NokiaN95closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.132 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Series60 3NokiaN95 8GBmobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:04 | by ThaDafinser