User agent detail

Safari5531.21.10 CFNetwork/438.14 Darwin/9.8.0 (i386) (MacBook5%2C2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mac OS X 10.5.8 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.07 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari5531 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.5.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.5desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 438.14closeMac OS X 10.5.8AppleMacBook5,2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Mac OS X 10.5.8desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:04 | by ThaDafinser