User agent detail

SonyEricssonT200/R101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonT200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonT200 R101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonT200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonT200smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonT200closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson T200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonT200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonT200Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:04 | by ThaDafinser