User agent detail

BIRD.F501/1.00 Nucleus RTOS/V1.11.19 MTK6227/05C_V24 Release/11.21.2006 Browser/Teleca Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
BirdF501 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BIRD closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM BirdF501mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo MTK / Nucleus BirdF501feature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close BirdF501closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo BirdF501mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close BirdF501Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:04 | by ThaDafinser