User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-US; Lenovo A690 DEODEX Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.0.308 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA690 DEODEX Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.308closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA690 DEODEXsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeAndroid 2.3.6LenovoA690 DEODEXcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.308WebKit 534.31Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 534.31Android 2.3.6LenovoA690mobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:03 | by ThaDafinser