User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-D728/Series60 2.1/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-D728 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-D728 Series60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 SamsungD728mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Symbian OS Series 60 2.1SamsungSGH-D728smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSGH-D728closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Symbian Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 SamsungD728mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungSGH-D728Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:03 | by ThaDafinser