User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Aquaris E4 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214.89Android 4.4.2Blink bqAquaris E4smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.117 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214.89closeAndroid 4.4.2BQAquaris E4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.269 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 40.0Blink Android 4.4bqAquaris E4smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.4.2Aquaris E4closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.4.2bqAquaris E4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.4BQAquaris E4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:02 | by ThaDafinser