User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.80 Safari/537.36 ASW/1.46.1990.55
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-848.php
Avast SafeZone 1.46Win10 10.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Avast SafeZone 1.46Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.80closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 46.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.80closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 46.0.2490closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.80closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.80WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.502 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 46Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.80closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closecompatible Desktopcloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:02 | by ThaDafinser