User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.76 Safari/537.36 Seznam.cz/1.2.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-703.php
Seznam Browser 1.2Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Seznam Browser 1.2Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.428 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:02 | by ThaDafinser