User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.1-update1; xx; C8600; 320*480) UCWEB8.3.1.151/145/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.3Android 2.1 HuaweiC8600mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.3WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.307 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.1closeAndroid 2.1.0closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.3.1.151closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.1.151 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3 Android 2.1HuaweiC8600mobile:smartyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:02 | by ThaDafinser