User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; SMP53-210 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
YarvikSMP53-210 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.278 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.0.4YarvikSMP53-210closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.0.4SMP53-210mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.097 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:01 | by ThaDafinser