User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; Nokia203/20.37) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.7.0.218 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.7Series40 Gecko NokiaAsha 203mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close NokiaAsha 203mobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 Symbian Nokia203smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 20.37)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0close Nokia203closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.218 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 203closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 203mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 8close NokiaAsha 203Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:01 | by ThaDafinser