User agent detail

ichiro/3.0 (http://help.goo.ne.jp/door/crawler.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
yesIchiro BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesIchiro BotBot/Crawler0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ichiro 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesichiro/3.0close0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesichiro0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesichiroclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesichiroCrawler0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesIchiroclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesgooclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:01 | by ThaDafinser