User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; MAFS; InfoPath.2; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; MSOffice 12)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 11.0Windows 7Trident Fujitsudesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Outlook 2007 closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows 7Fujitsudesktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Outlook 2007closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.1Fujitsucloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.363 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Microsoft Office 12Trident 7.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:01 | by ThaDafinser