User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; LG E400 Build/IMM76L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.128 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-lg.yaml
Chrome 36Android 4.0.4Blink 537.36LGOptimus L3mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.128closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 36.0.1985.128closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 36.0Blink Android 4.0LGE400smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.128closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 36.0.1985closeAndroid 4.0.4LGE400closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.128WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink Android 4.0.4LGOptimus L3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.128closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:01 | by ThaDafinser