User agent detail

Instagram 1.1.3 Android (15/4.0.3; 240dpi; 540x960; HTC/tmous; HTC VLE_U; ville; ville; en_US)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCtmous Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Instagram App 1.1WebKit Android AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Instagram closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCOne Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.259 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCVLE Usmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCtmouscloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.446 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android HTCOne Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:01 | by ThaDafinser