User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; U; E7-00; de-DE) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Qt/4.7.4 Mobile Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE7-00 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Symbian^3 yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeSymbian^3 NokiaE7-00closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.3 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qt 4.7.4Webkit 534.3Series60 5.2NokiaE7-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:00 | by ThaDafinser