User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.5; en-US; SCH-I909 Build/5TJNJ2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-I909 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.5SamsungGalaxy Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.425 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0SamsungSCH-I909smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.5closeAndroid 4.0.5SamsungSCH-I909closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.0.5Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.5SamsungGalaxy Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.049 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:59 | by ThaDafinser