User agent detail

WidgetManager; HTC vfpioneer; Opera/9.80 (Android 1.6; U; Opera Widgets Mobi; de; 1010290100) Presto/2.4.15 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCvfpioneer Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeAndroid 1.6HTCvfpioneermobile-browseryescloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.00Presto Android 1.6HTCvfpioneersmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.0closeAndroid 1.6HTCvfpioneercloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.00closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.1 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.15Android 1.6HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.15Android 1.6HTCvfpioneermobile:smartyescloseclose0.09801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 1.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:59 | by ThaDafinser