User agent detail

LG-GW520/V10a Obigo/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; LG-GW520) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGW520 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-GW520 V10acloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGGW520smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGGW520closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 LGLGGW520closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0Gecko LGGW520mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close LGGW520Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:59 | by ThaDafinser