User agent detail

Spyglass_Mosaic/2.11 IRIX5.2 Spyglass/11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-mosaic.yaml
Spyglass Mosaic 2.11IRIX desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Spyglass closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Spyglass Mosaic 2.11closeIRIX desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IRIX 5.2desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mosaic 2.11 IRIX closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Spyglass Mosaic 2.11 IRIX desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:58 | by ThaDafinser