User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows Mobile; xx) Opera 10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 10.00Windows Mobile mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.00closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.00Presto Windows Mobile yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.0closeWindows Mobile closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.00closeWindows Mobile closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0 Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00 Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:58 | by ThaDafinser