User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Unix; xx) AppleWebKit/537.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1295.0 Safari/537.15 Surf/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Surf 1.0Unix Webkit 537.15desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 24.0WebKit 0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 24.0.1295close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Surf 1.0closeUnix closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 24.0.1295.0WebKit 537.15a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Surf 1.0Webkit 537.15Unix desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 24.0.1312.52closeUnknown Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:58 | by ThaDafinser