User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT; Win64; x64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 Waterfox/26.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-052.php
Waterfox 26.0WinNT unknown26.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Waterfox 26.0Gecko 26.0WinNT Windows DesktopDesktop0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 26.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.278 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 26.0Gecko Windows NTdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 26.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 26.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 26.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.152 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 26.0Gecko 20100101Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.485 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Waterfox 26.0Gecko 26.0Windows desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:58 | by ThaDafinser