User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Linux; xx; DTV; TSBNetTV/T4D018C01.0203.CDD) AppleWebKit/534(KHTML, like Gecko) NX/3.0 (DTV; HTML; R1.0;) DTVNetBrowser/2.2 (000039;T4D018C01;0203;CDD) InettvBrowser/2.2 (000039;T4D018C01;0203;CDD)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/toshiba.yaml
NetFront NX 3.0 Webkit 534ToshibaSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront NX 3.0close media-playercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux Toshibatv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux T4D018C01closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2WebKit 534Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 3.0Webkit 534 ToshibaSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:58 | by ThaDafinser