User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome Beta 0.2.149.27Windows 2000Webkit 525.13desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 0.2WebKit Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 0.2WebKit Windows 2000desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 0.2.149closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 0.2.149.27WebKit 525.13Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Beta 0.2.149.27Webkit 525.13Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:57 | by ThaDafinser