User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) Snowshoe/1.0.0 Safari/537.21
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Snowshoe 1.0.0GNU/Linux WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.107 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.21closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.21closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Snowshoe 1.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Snowshoe 1.0.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.21Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Snowshoe 1.0Webkit 537.21Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:57 | by ThaDafinser