User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux) AppleWebKit/531.2+ Midori/0.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-050.php
Midori 0.3Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Midori 0.3WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.3WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.3closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.3WebKit 531.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.3Webkit 531.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:57 | by ThaDafinser