User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1284.49
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-041.php
Opera 18.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 18.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.158 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1284.49closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1284closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.57closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1284.49WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:57 | by ThaDafinser