User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian0S/9.2 U; Series60/3.1 NokiaN95_8GB/15.0.012 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko/413)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN95_8GB Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.285 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.1NokiaN95smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 15.0.012closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1close NokiaN95_8GBcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.113 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia N95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.1NokiaN95 8GBmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:56 | by ThaDafinser