User agent detail

4D530A3D/1.6.4.30605 (Dell Inc.; Inspiron 5720; Windows 8 (X86); de-DE)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DellInc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
4D530A3D 1.6.4.30605closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8DellGT-E2121Lsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows DellInccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SRWare Iron Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:56 | by ThaDafinser