User agent detail

HTC-P3450-Ten/PPC; 240x320; OpVer 23.227.2.792 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.8.0.95
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCP3450-Ten Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 4.01closeWindows HTCP3450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Windows CE HTCP3450-Tensmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeWindows CE HTCP3450-Tencloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.489 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8Gecko Windows Mobile HTCP3450mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCP3450Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:56 | by ThaDafinser