User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.1/27.2213; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 400X240 Pantech CDM8992085
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechCDM8992085 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto Brew AudiovoxCDM-8992085smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1closeBREW PantechCDM8992085closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.436 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119Brew PantechCDM8992085mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:56 | by ThaDafinser