User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; HbbTV/1.2.1 (; Philips; 32PFG550978
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/philips.yaml
Opera Devices television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.80Presto GNU/Linux Philips32PFG550978tv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.80closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux HbbTVcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.111 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.80 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices televisioncloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:56 | by ThaDafinser