User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/6.0; WOW64; Trident/6.0; BingPreview/1.0b)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesBing Preview Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.085 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingPreview 1.0bTrident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.431 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBing Previewclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:55 | by ThaDafinser