User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2; ru-ru; T9666-1 Build/IMI) AppleWebKit/537.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/537.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Android 4.0Android 4.2unknown TelsdaT9666-1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2TelsdaT9666-1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.283 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2T9666-1closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 537.16Android 4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 537.16Android 4.2T9666-1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.08 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:55 | by ThaDafinser