User agent detail

Huawei/1.0/H12HW/B000 Browser/Obigo-Browser/Q04A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-emobile.yaml
Obigo Q 4A HuaweiH12HWmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Huawei 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 4close HuaweiH12HWmobile-browseryescloseclose0.175 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Huawei1smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.462 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 4A HuaweiH12HWmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo close HuaweiH11HWFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:55 | by ThaDafinser