User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130823 Firefox/10.0.11esrpre Iceape/2.7.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Iceape 2.7.12GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 10.0Gecko 10.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.064 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 10.0.11esrprecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 10.0.11esrprecloseLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceape 2.7Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 10.0.11esrprecloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceape 2.7.12closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceape 2.7.12closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceape 2.7.12Gecko 20130823Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceape 2.7.12Gecko 10.0.12Linux desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 10.0.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:55 | by ThaDafinser