User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.99; Build/LPV81C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.69 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Chrome 38Android LBlink 537.36mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.69closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125.69closeAndroid 4.4.99HTC0PCV1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.177 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 38.0Blink Android 4.4smartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.69closeAndroid 4.4.99closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.4.99closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.99closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.69WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android Lmobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.69closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.097 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:55 | by ThaDafinser