User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (FreeBSD; U; Viera; like Android 4.0.2; xx; ja-jp) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Viera/2.0.0 DIGAPlus/1.0.0 Mobile/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
Viera Browser 2.0.0 Webkit 534.30PanasonicVieratelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.0.2GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0PanasonicSmart TVtvyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.2closeAndroid 4.0.2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Viera Browser 2.0.0Webkit 534.30 PanasonicVieratelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:55 | by ThaDafinser