User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 9.0; en-US)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
yesFake IEBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 9.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident Windows NTdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 9.0 Windows NT 9.0desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:55 | by ThaDafinser