User agent detail

lg-a255/UC Browser7.9.0.102/69/352 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGa255 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
lg-a255 UCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.102close LGa255mobile-browseryescloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 LGa255smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0close LGa255closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.102 LGLGa255closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Gecko LGa255mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:54 | by ThaDafinser