User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1932.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-199.php
Chrome 36.0MacOSX 10.9unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 36.0Blink MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1932.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1932.0closeOS X 10.9.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink Mac 10.9desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1932.0closeOS X 10.9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1932closeMac OS X 10.9.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1932.0closeOS X 10.9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1932.0WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.9.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 36.0.1932.0Blink OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1932.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:53 | by ThaDafinser