User agent detail

BrightSign/6.1.3-td (DM-RMC-100-STR) Mozilla/5.0 (Unknown; Linux mips) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) QtWebEngine/5.4.3 Chrome/37.0.2062.103 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/signage/other.yaml
BrightSign 6.1.3 Blink 537.36BrightSignDM-RMC-100-STRsignage Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.103closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.103closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.103closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
QtWeb Internet Browser closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.103WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
BrightSign 6.1.3Blink BrightSignDM-RMC-100-STRsignagecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.103closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:53 | by ThaDafinser