User agent detail

MQQBrowser/3.1/Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; zh-cn; Lenovo A60+ Build/LenovoLePhone) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
QQ Browser 3.1Android 2.3.6WebKit LenovoA60+smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser 3.1WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6LenovoA60+mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 3.1WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA60+smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 3.1closeAndroid 2.3.6LenovoA60+closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 3.1WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.1Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6LenovoA60mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA60+Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.085 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:53 | by ThaDafinser